|
|
 |
|
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
Understanding Colorectal Cancer
Understanding the link between
colorectal cancer and metastatic liver
cancer
Prevalence
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common
malignancies in industrialized nations, ranking
fourth behind lung, breast and prostate cancers.
About 140,000 new cases are diagnosed annually in
the United States.1
Colorectal cancer is the second most lethal
malignancy after lung cancer. According to the
American Cancer Society, colon and rectal cancers
combined cause about 55,000 deaths in the United
States each year.
The connection to metastatic liver cancer
There are important distinctions between
primary and secondary liver cancers. In primary
liver cancer, the cancerous cells originate in the
liver. The prevalent form of primary liver cancer
originates in the hepatocytes, the most common
type of liver cell, and can either begin as a
single tumor or in simultaneous spots in the
liver. When the cancer originates from another
part of the body, such as the colon, and
metastasizes (spreads) to the liver, the condition
is known as metastatic colon cancer.
In
the United States, the vast majority of patients
with liver cancer developed it as a secondary
condition rather than as a primary cancer
originating in the liver. In up to 70 percent of
colorectal cancer cases, the cancer eventually
metastasizes to the liver. Even if the primary
(colon) tumor is completely removed, metastatic
liver cancer remains a risk for many patients.
Treatment options differ
depending on the location of the liver tumor and
whether or not it is primary or metastatic.
Although surgery is a widely accepted treatment,
only about 25% of patients with metastatic
colorectal cancer confined to the liver are
surgical candidates due to the size, distribution
or accessibility of the tumors.
|
|
For patients whose cancer is confined to the
liver and is surgically accessible, the five-year
survival rate is approximately 35%. By contrast,
in patients with similar disease who are not
surgical candidates and who receive systemic
chemotherapy, there are very few who survive 5
years.
The American Cancer Society reports
the death rate from colorectal cancer has declined
for the past 15 years due to fewer incidents of
primary colorectal cancer, earlier diagnoses and
improved treatments. This includes promising
developments in minimally invasive interventions
that offer treatment options for patients with
inoperable metastases confined to the liver.
Treatment options
Current treatment regimens for liver cancer
include surgical excision, systemic chemotherapy,
radio frequency ablation (RFA), cryotherapy,
alcohol injection, laser photocoagulation, hepatic
arterial chemotherapy (HAC) and trans-arterial
chemo-embolization (TACE). Additional information
on these and other treatments is available from
the National Cancer Institute. Each
of these treatment options has limitations, and
none has been adopted as the standard procedure
for treatment of liver
cancer.
Developmental treatments include
tumor vaccines, cytotoxic drugs, gene therapy and
hormone receptor blocking agents. Despite decades
of research, these new treatments under
investigation have so far failed to make any
significant impact on management of patients with
liver cancer.
One promising treatment for
patients with inoperable metastatic liver cancer
is a procedure known as Selective Internal
Radiation Therapy (SIRT). SIRT involves the
introduction of yttrium-90 containing SIR-Spheres
microspheres into the liver via a catheter.
Treatment is administered on an outpatient basis,
and side effects are generally fewer than with
alternative treatments.
Because liver
tumors tend to be hypervascular (their outer rims
contain many capillaries), the infused SIR-Spheres
microspheres become trapped in the small blood
vessels supplying the tumor. This is due to the
fact that liver tumors receive most, if not all,
of their blood supply from the hepatic (liver)
artery, and the radioactive microspheres are
injected into the hepatic artery and carried by
the blood flow to the tumor. Once trapped within
the capillaries supplying the tumor, SIR-Spheres
microspheres irradiate the cancer cells, leading
to the destruction of the tumor while the normal
liver tissue remains relatively unaffected.
Clinical studies
There have been many clinical trials involving
SIR-Spheres microspheres. In a randomized clinical
trial involving individuals with inoperable
metastases in the liver, patients treated with
SIR-Spheres microspheres and hepatic arterial
chemotherapy (HAC) fared better than patients
receiving only HAC. This pivotal study provided
the basis for FDA approval of SIR-Spheres
microspheres in the USA. In the study, patients
treated with SIR-Spheres microspheres and HAC had
a median time to disease progression, as measured
by tumor size, of 15.9 months vs. 9.7
months for those receiving HAC alone. Survival
rates for the patients receiving SIR-Spheres
microspheres were higher at various intervals than
for those just receiving HAC: 72 percent vs. 68
percent at one year; 39 percent vs. 29 percent at
two years; 17 percent vs. 6 percent at three
years; and 3.5 percent vs. zero percent at five
years.2
In a separate randomized trial, patients
receiving a combined chemotherapy treatment of
fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin plus
SIR-Spheres microspheres showed more favorable
results in response rate, time to disease
progression (18.6 months vs. 3.6 months) and
survival benefit (29.4 months vs. 12.8 months)
than patients only receiving
chemotherapy.3 Positive outcomes have
also been realized in phase I dose-escalation
studies involving SIRT plus irinotecan (median
time to disease progression of 7.5 months; median
survival of 12 months)5 or SIR-Spheres
microspheres combined with fluorouracil,
leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) with median
time to disease progression of 7 months and a
median survival that had not yet been reached at
the time of the study's
publication.4
A retrospective
review of 116 chemo-refractory patients who
received SIRT to treat colorectal cancer
metastatic to the liver following failed first-
and second-line chemotherapy demonstrated
objective response rates at three months of 90
percent by PET scan. These patients had a median
survival of approximately 11
months.6 |
|
Statistics and studies
referenced in this section are derived from the
following sources:
1. Robert J.
Porte and Pierre-Alain Clavien, "Etiology, and
Natural History of Liver Tumors," Malignant Liver
Tumors: Current and Emerging Therapies, second
edition, edited by Pierre A. Clavien (Jones and
Bartlett Publishers, 2004), pp.
27-38
2. Gray, B., et al.,
Randomised trial of SIR-Spheres microspheres plus
chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for treating
patients with liver metastases from primary large
bowel cancer. Annals of Oncology, 2001. 12: p.
1711-1720.
3. Van Hazel, G., et al.,
Randomised phase 2 trial of SIR-Spheres
microspheres plus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin
chemotherapy versus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin
chemotherapy alone in advanced colorectal cancer.
Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2004. 88: p.
78-85.
4. Van Hazel, G., et al.,
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) plus
systemic chemotherapy with FOLFOX 4 [oxaliplatin,
5-fluorouracil and leucovorin]: a phase 1 dose
escalation study (abstr). Presented at the
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2005
Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, Hollywood, FL,
January 2005.
5. Van Hazel, G., et
al., Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)
plus systemic chemotherapy with irinotecan: a
phase 1 dose escalation study (abstr). Presented
at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2005
Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, Hollywood, FL,
January 2005.
6. Kennedy, A., et
al., "Liver brachytherapy for unresectable
colorectal metastases: U.S. results 2000-2004".
Presented at the American Society of Clinical
Oncology 2005 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium,
Hollywood, FL, January 2005.
top
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|